基本信息
- 来源: arxiv
- 原始来源: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.23086v1
- 作者: Nathaniel Mitrani Hadida, Sassan Bhanji, Cameron Tice, Puria Radmard
- 分类: cs.AI
- 论文时间: 2026-01-30T15:34:14Z
- 论文 PDF: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.23086v1.pdf
来源摘要/节选
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning provides a significant performance uplift to LLMs by enabling planning, exploration, and deliberation of their actions. CoT is also a powerful tool for monitoring the behaviours of these agents: when faithful, they offer interpretations of the model’s decision making process, and an early warning sign for dangerous behaviours. However, optimisation pressures placed on the CoT may cause the model to obfuscate reasoning traces, losing this beneficial property. We show that obfuscation can generalise across tasks; models that learn to obfuscate reasoning involving reward hacking (e.g. accessing and utilising leaked information) generalise both the reward hacking behaviour and its obfuscation in CoT to unseen reward hacking settings. Most worryingly, we show that obfuscation of CoT reasoning, and its generalisation across tasks, also follows when we penalise only the model’s final actions after closing its CoT. Our findings suggest that current practices of penalising harmful generations may inadvertently lead to a reduction in the broader monitorability of LLMs in unpredictable ways.
来源说明
当前只保存了官方论文摘要,不代表论文全文。请以原始来源为准。
本页只呈现已做哈希绑定的来源证据,不包含基于旧正文或缺失原文的扩展推断。