基本信息

来源摘要/节选

Can AI agents predict whether they will succeed at a task? We study agentic uncertainty by eliciting success probability estimates before, during, and after task execution. All results exhibit agentic overconfidence: some agents that succeed only 22% of the time predict 77% success. Counterintuitively, pre-execution assessment with strictly less information tends to yield better discrimination than standard post-execution review, though differences are not always significant. Adversarial prompting reframing assessment as bug-finding achieves the best calibration.

来源说明

当前只保存了官方论文摘要,不代表论文全文。请以原始来源为准。

本页只呈现已做哈希绑定的来源证据,不包含基于旧正文或缺失原文的扩展推断。