基本信息
- 来源: blogs_podcasts
- 原始来源: https://openai.com/index/why-codex-security-doesnt-include-sast
来源摘要/节选
公开展示已截断至最多 800 个字符;请访问原始来源查看完整上下文。
For decades, static application security testing (SAST) has been one of the most effective ways security teams scale code review.
But when we built Codex Security, we made a deliberate design choice: we didn’t start by importing a static analysis report and asking the agent to triage it. We designed the system to start with the repository itself—its architecture, trust boundaries, and intended behavior—and to validate what it finds before it asks a human to spend time on it.
The reason is simple: the hardest vulnerabilities usually aren’t dataflow problems. They happen when code appears to enforce a security check, but that check doesn’t actually guarantee the property the system relies on.…
来源说明
当前只保存了公开页面节选,不代表原文全文。请以原始来源为准。
本页只呈现已做哈希绑定的来源证据,不包含基于旧正文或缺失原文的扩展推断。