基本信息
- 来源: arxiv
- 原始来源: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06331v1
- 发布域名: arxiv.org
- 分类: cs.DB
- 作者: Donna Hooshmand、Shubham Shahi、Cameron Barrie 等
要点解读
这是什么
TYTAN是一种自动从关系数据库构建分析型语义模式的系统，结合数据库的符号分析和基于LLM的语义推断，并在信息不足以确定时向用户提出自然语言问题以明确角色和命名。
用在哪里
适用于需要快速为数据添加语义层、支持自然语言查询或自动报表生成的分析平台，帮助非技术用户降低对专家手工编写模式的依赖。
可以推断的
推测：该系统在实际使用中可能需要处理多种结构的关系库，并且对表的主键、聚合特征等有一定识别能力。
推测：当用户提供的描述信息有限时，系统可能更依赖交互式提问来补充语义推断的不足。
来源摘要/节选
From natural-language query interfaces to automated report generation, data analysis tools need a description of the data: the real-world entities it contains, which columns function as measures or identifiers, and how tables connect into units of analysis. Today, this semantic layer is usually written by hand. This is a knowledge-acquisition bottleneck that limits the scalability of analytic systems, keeps non-technical users dependent on experts, and is itself error-prone. We present TYTAN, a system for automatically constructing an analytic semantic schema from a relational database and, when available, a short user-provided description. TYTAN combines symbolic analysis of the database with LLM-based semantic inference for entity proposal, role assignment, and naming. When the evidence leaves a decision ambiguous, TYTAN asks the user a targeted natural-language question. We evaluate TYTAN on eight databases spanning real-world and benchmark domains along the three axes that define a schema’s functional utility: (i) coverage, are all important entities and features captured?; (ii) retrieval correctness, do the schema’s instructions actually reach the data; and (iii) characterization accuracy, are semantic types correct? Across the seven reference domains, TYTAN reaches every entity, attribute, and aggregable feature of the expert-corrected reference schemas (100% coverage). Additionally, 100% of its retrieval instructions execute correctly (1,678 of 1,678 self-generated claims), and semantic roles agree with the reference on 92-100% of matched attributes. Checking the underlying data showed the small disagreement is in the reference, not in TYTAN. On a held-out blind test (a live, ten-table database with no declared keys), TYTAN recovers the full entity structure with verified keys and satisfies 100% of the satisfiable expectations of five independent blind annotators.
来源说明
当前保存的是来源摘要，不代表论文全文。请以原始来源为准。
「要点解读」由 AI Stack 依据上方已保存内容整理，不代表来源的完整表述；标注「推测：」的判断来自编辑，不是来源陈述。