基本信息
- 来源: arxiv
- 原始来源: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13560v1
- 发布域名: arxiv.org
- 分类: cs.CV
- 作者: Yaxin Luo、Haobin Jiang、Jialv Zou 等
要点解读
这是什么
AutoDesign 是一个让元‑框架优化器指导代码代理依据 rollout 反馈递归改进系统结构的框架，聚焦于从学术论文自动生成海报的任务，并配套提供 PosterBench 评测集。
用在哪里
适用于需要把大量文本素材快速转化为视觉呈现的研究或产品场景，尤其在多学科论文转海报的过程中追求高质量、低成本输出的团队。
可以推断的
推测：该框架的核心思路——通过元优化器结合人类设计先验进行递归调优——或可迁移至其他需要逐步优化生成流程的任务，如文档自动排版或交互原型生成。
推测：把人类设计偏好与自动化调优相结合的机制，可能会提升长时程、多轮交互式系统的鲁棒性与生成质量。
来源摘要/节选
Transforming multimodal sources into condensed and structured media outputs can be fundamentally conceptualized as a long-horizon agentic process centered on a model-harness system. While an ideal harness system should align with human design priors and accumulate reusable experience through empirical exploration to drive recursive self-improvement, existing paradigms remain static and fall short of this capability. In this paper, we present AutoDesign, a framework that aligns with human design priors, where a meta-harness optimizer guides a code agent to recursively improve harness based on rollout feedback. To instantiate and evaluate this framework, we focus on the academic paper-to-poster generation task and introduce PosterBench, comprising a 100-paper Main Track spanning five disciplines and PosterBench-mini, a shared 10-paper subset for controlled evaluation. On the PosterBench Main Track, AutoDesign achieves the highest score of 78.32, surpassing the closed-source commercial system Claude Design by 7.45 points. Across seven controlled code-agent-model configurations, integrating the learned DesignHarness consistently improves performance, increasing the average PosterBench Score from 54.99 to 67.39 (+12.4%). In a fully autonomous long-horizon loop, it executes 253 tool calls and 11 editing turns within 40 minutes for under $3, reaching average conference-poster quality in human evaluation. A system-blind human study further demonstrates that AutoDesign achieves the highest human preference among evaluated systems.
来源说明
当前保存的是来源摘要，不代表论文全文。请以原始来源为准。
「要点解读」由 AI Stack 依据上方已保存内容整理，不代表来源的完整表述；标注「推测：」的判断来自编辑，不是来源陈述。