基本信息
- 来源: arxiv
- 原始来源: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12253v1
- 发布域名: arxiv.org
- 分类: cs.CL
- 作者: Simon Yu、Nicholas Tomlin、Marwa Abdulhai 等
要点解读
这是什么
这是一篇探讨多智能体强化学习中,单个语言模型模拟用户时出现的模式坍缩(simulator collapse)问题的研究,作者提出在推理时扩展采样多样性的方法,以及在训练时使用多模拟器协同训练的方法,以提升策略在不同环境下的迁移能力。
用在哪里
适用于人机对话系统的研发团队、需要训练多轮交互策略的研究者,以及关注强化学习泛化能力的工程师。
可以推断的
推测:在训练环境缺乏多样性时,模型容易学习到针对单一模式的捷径,导致在实际部署时表现下降。
推测:通过在训练阶段引入多个可调节的模拟器或采用多样化的响应抽样,可以缓解模式坍缩,提升策略的鲁棒性。
来源摘要/节选
Multi-agent reinforcement learning for human-AI interaction typically relies on a single large language model to simulate user behavior. We show that this approach systematically fails to generalize, and trace the failure to simulator collapse: because the simulator LLM is mode-collapsed, an LLM policy trained against it overfits to narrow strategies that exploit the simulator’s dominant mode, and such a policy transfers poorly to unseen simulators and real users. We formalize this collapse theoretically and propose two complementary solutions, one at inference time and one at training time. The inference-time solution, Verbalized Sampling, broadens the simulator’s behavior by sampling from a verbalized response distribution, reducing mode collapse. The training-time solution, Co-Training, jointly optimizes the policy against a population of trainable simulators, preventing it from overfitting to any single simulator’s mode. We validate both solutions on three multi-turn benchmarks: Persuasion for Good, $τ^2$-bench, and CooperBench. Verbalized Sampling improves held-out success by up to 9% over single-simulator RL, and Co-Training pushes gains further to 14%; the human study shows similar gain on real users. Both solutions preserve the policy diversity that collapses under single-simulator RL. To support further work in this direction, we release SCOPE, an open-source framework for Population Co-Training multi-agent RL. More broadly, our results suggest that the diversity of the training environment, not only the policy, is critical to the generalization of multi-turn RL to real-world deployment.
来源说明
当前保存的是来源摘要,不代表论文全文。请以原始来源为准。
「要点解读」由 AI Stack 依据上方已保存内容整理,不代表来源的完整表述;标注「推测:」的判断来自编辑,不是来源陈述。