基本信息
- 来源: arxiv
- 原始来源: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24851v1
- 发布域名: arxiv.org
- 分类: cs.NE
- 作者: Gabriel Bontemps、Abhishek Banerjee
要点解读
这是什么
这项研究把信息提供者的决策过程本身当作可信度来源，用强化学习智能体在二元选择任务中通过漂移‑扩散过程同时生成选择、决策时间和置信度，并把置信度映射为社会影响权重，考察其对社会学习动态的影响。
用在哪里
适用于研究社会影响力、信息可信度以及多智能体学习的科研人员和工程师；在设计抑制错误共识或提升群体决策质量的交互机制时，可参考此模型进行实验或系统改进。
可以推断的
- 推测：若将发送者的置信度作为转发或推荐的依据，中等强度的传播有助于快速纠正错误，但过强的传播可能让错误观点在群体中固化。
- 推测：通过调节跨社区的信息渗透率，可在保持适度分歧的同时防止整体锁定在错误共识上。
来源摘要/节选
Social interaction can improve collective learning but also amplify early mistakes. We study this tension when the credibility of social information is generated by the sender’s own decision process rather than fixed ex ante. Reinforcement-learning agents make binary choices through a drift–diffusion process that jointly determines choice, decision time, and confidence; decision confidence then becomes social credibility by weighting anticipatory influence and retrospective social learning. Under balanced community exposure, the anticipatory field admits an exact quotient representation. Its local Jacobian is a scalar decision-sensitivity term multiplying the community-coupling matrix, which yields a common-mode amplification threshold and an analytical role for cross-community permeability in damping relative community differences. Monte Carlo experiments show the corresponding non-monotone performance pattern: moderate transmission accelerates correction, whereas strong transmission can lock populations into wrong consensus; low permeability instead sustains disagreement. Ablations reveal a dual role for confidence: credibility-sensitive transmission amplifies social error, while confidence-dependent private learning stabilises it. The model yields testable predictions linking sender confidence to receiver behaviour conditional on accuracy.
来源说明
当前保存的是来源摘要，不代表论文全文。请以原始来源为准。
「要点解读」由 AI Stack 依据上方已保存内容整理，不代表来源的完整表述；标注「推测：」的判断来自编辑，不是来源陈述。