基本信息

要点解读

这是什么

Agensh 是一个去中心化的多智能体框架，让大量工作单元通过共享工作区、消息接口和公共上下文自行组织、竞争和协作完成任务，而无需统一的调度者。

用在哪里

该方案适合需要高并发、低时延且任务可拆分的复杂场景，尤其在算力或时间预算紧张时，可通过扩大智能体规模来提升整体效能。

可以推断的

  • 推测：在没有中心调度的情况下，任务分解、自我认领和结果验证的循环机制是实现大规模并发的关键。
  • 推测：随着智能体数量增多，组织内部会逐步形成标准化的协作模式，从而进一步提升任务完成率。

来源摘要/节选

A multi-agent system can reduce latency on complex tasks by executing work concurrently. Several pioneering harness frameworks support multi-agent systems. However, the scalability of current multi-agent harnesses is often constrained by a central orchestrator’s capacity to allocate tasks and coordinate workers. To address this limitation, we introduce Agensh, a scalable self-organized multi-agent harness without a central orchestrator: concurrent workers execute a multi-agent cooperation loop, continuously gathering context, claiming and self-assigning sub-tasks, taking action and sharing findings, verifying results, and merging progress in an asynchronous manner. The loop is supported by the agentic organization infrastructure comprising three components: a shared workspace holds proposed, ongoing, and completed work; a message interface lets workers communicate; and shared context retains reusable findings and work intentions. To test the scalability of Agensh, we evaluate it on the five hardest ProgramBench tasks with GPT-5.6-sol (high). Scaling from 1 to 128 agents raises the mean final test-pass rate from 19.31% to 28.78%, an approximately 49% relative improvement. Larger organizations reach comparable test-pass rates earlier. On pandoc, scaling from 1 to 1,024 agents raises the final test-pass rate from 33.89% to 55.06%. Worker trajectories further show that different forms of self-organized cooperation gradually emerges and standardizes as the organization grows. These results reveal the number of agents as a new scaling dimension for multi-agent organizations to expand the frontier of general intelligence, offering a practical solution for complex tasks under hard latency constraints or time budgets.

来源说明

当前保存的是来源摘要，不代表论文全文。请以原始来源为准。

「要点解读」由 AI Stack 依据上方已保存内容整理，不代表来源的完整表述；标注「推测：」的判断来自编辑，不是来源陈述。